Jump to content
The MT-07 Forum

MPG


Claude

Recommended Posts

100% stock 2017 FZ07

Did a 200 km ride this afternoon, back and forth on the highway.

Got 5.0 L/100 km (47 MPG [US]) for the first half and 4.7 L/100 km (50 MPG [US]) for the second half. My speed was 110 kmh (68 mph) indicated (103 kph/64 mph on the GPS). I'm 6 ft tall with 1 inch bar risers.

Kind of surprised (deceived) as those are the numbers I get with my 2017 Kawasaki Versys 1000. I was expecting quite lower consumption on the FZ.

QUESTIONS

1) Is this normal fuel numbers?

2) I currently have a 17T front sprocket I could install. Can I expect lower fuel number with a 17T?

Thanks!

Edited by Claude
Omitted some info
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Global Moderator

Last year I averaged 47.82 mpg (using actual mileage divided by actual fuel purchased).  I do not try to save fuel and have a tune, MWR air filter and lid, no O2 sensor with a stock exhaust.  I was getting almost 58 mpg when it was 100% stock. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I averaged ~52mpg with a stock ECU. But on a long highway trip fuel mileage would suffer. Cruising above 50-55 mph would drop fuel mileage down to low-mid 40's. Interstate speeds of 79-80+ would drop mpg down in to the 30's. Kept a 17t on hand for long trips and it was good for ~3mpg on the interstate.

Your Versys 1000 engine has an abundance of power and doesn't have to work as hard at those speeds. You probably cruise at a lower throttle opening. Was taking to a guy about his 180hp Speed Triple 1200 and he's getting 50mpg regularly. Gobs of power. Bike never works hard. Sub 100hp bikes tend to lose fuel efficiency when traveling at higher speeds. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, shinyribs said:

...Kept a 17t on hand for long trips and it was good for ~3mpg on the interstate...

Was there a noticeable trade off on torque? I was positively surprised by FZ07's torque when I first rode it so I think 17T is quite possibly very acceptable. Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Claude said:

Was there a noticeable trade off on torque? I was positively surprised by FZ07's torque when I first rode it so I think 17T is quite possibly very acceptable. Thanks!

It was noticeable, but not a big drop off. It took sightly more effort/timing to wheelie in second gear, but that's about it. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, shinyribs said:

sightly more effort/timing to wheelie in second gear,

Bone stock 22 MT-07.
if not paying attention and just hammering through the gears .. 1st, 2nd, & 3rd will pull front wheel.

Twice I have had it come up on 4th. (trying).

Purely city riding. No highway pulls.
~47 mpg 6'2"  old fat man.

2022 Yamaha MT-07 Cyan Storm, 2005 Kawasaki Vulcan 2000 [VN2000A], 1997 Yamaha YZF600R - Thundercat [project]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
cornerslider

2016 FZ-07, stock motor internals, Hordpower intake, 2WDW ECU flash, Akrapovic Ti exhaust = Mid 50's MPG on the street, 19 MPG on track.... If you ride this bike as it was designed (a "street" bike), it's very efficient. Once you deviate from the design perimeters- all bets are off....

  • Like 1

""W.O.T. until you see god, then brake"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Triple Jim

I  haven't ridden 68 MPH for any distance, because most of my riding is on back twisty roads.  If I ride a whole tank mostly at 45 mph, I often get into the low 70s MPG.  If I ride around home, some at 60, some around 50, in town, etc., I normally get  mid 60s.  I'm sure if I play around I can get it down in the 50s.

Of course air resistance is a major fuel consumer at high speed, so I'm not surprised at 50 MPG when riding near 70 MPH.

Edited by Triple Jim
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Grant31781

Normal riding I usually get 52 to 55 mpg. 60 to 65mph speeds.  I can push it  over 60mpg riding easy and slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Grant31781

Just filled up it was 56.5 mpg. Moderate acceleration with shifts around 5 to 6k speeds up to 70.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seeing around 55 mpg on my XSR700 with a Delkevic full exhaust with 18" can and quiet baffle in it.   I don't approach redline often because of the great power from 4000-7000 rpm, seldom over 6000 rpm.  

I've also considered installing the 17T counter shaft sprocket figuring it would take even better advantage of the broad flat torque curve.   I figure it might drop the revs about 500 rpm, which would seem to fit the riding I do.

Not sure what you expect, but hope you find what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Man I don't know how you guys are doing it. I blame the wrist...

I'm averageing around 40 mpg on my commute and 25-30mpg on my spirited rides.

Stock tune, akro Ti exhaust, no snorkel on airbox, stock gearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get 35 - 45 mpg. 35 mpg city riding, 45 highway.

Have 2wdw tune with full yoshi exhaust. Snorkel pulled.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stock 2022 with only 1700 miles on it, I zing it up to 8500-9000 rpm reasonably often. Otherwise I’m cruising in 4500-5000 rpm range. I’m typically seeing mileage in the 56-59 mpg range, don’t think I’ve ever dropped below 55 mpg. 6’2” tall, 205 lbs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Subito said:

Stock 2022 with only 1700 miles on it, I zing it up to 8500-9000 rpm reasonably often. Otherwise I’m cruising in 4500-5000 rpm range. I’m typically seeing mileage in the 56-59 mpg range, don’t think I’ve ever dropped below 55 mpg. 6’2” tall, 205 lbs.

Could be my fat ass lol. I'm 6' and about 240. I also cruise around 4500-6000 rpm, but rev it out pretty often. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a little disappointed by the mpg based on my initial impression from what people were saying, but I guess it really is up to your wrist. My bike is at 9k miles with OEM spark plugs. I wonder if changing them out will improve mpg a little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, tomlichu said:

I wonder if changing them out will improve mpg a little bit.

Unlikely, unless you're feeling misfiring now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

XSR stock except for full 18" Delkevic exhaust, have gotten around 55 mpg all along, no matter what.   I haven't reset the mpg feature on my dash, still mid 50s.   But then again I take advantage of the beefy power between 3500-5000 rpm most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Global Moderator
4 hours ago, klx678 said:

...But then again I take advantage of the beefy power between 3500-5000 rpm most of the time.

Me too, the meter thinks I get 49mpg but I've never done any kind of reset with the built in mpg feature. I need to read up if I'm supposed to do anything to "turn it on/begin measure" etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Resetting the MPG display is trivially easy.  Scroll to that display, and while it's blinking, push and hold the right button.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Global Moderator

I glanced at the user manual in toolbox, thinking "I probably should look at this sometime". Bike is a four yr old

Naw, I'm busy dipping the klr carb in Berryman...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.